Direct answer: The question touches on ethics, responsibility, and existential risk. There isn't a simple yes or no answer that applies universally; it depends on what standard you use and whom you consider. Broadly speaking, many people argue that humanity bears responsibility for how it uses power and resources, while also recognizing that not every individual bears equal culpability. Despairing conclusions about whether we “deserve destruction” can obscure opportunities to change course and reduce harm. If you’d like, I can tailor a thoughtful exploration based on a specific framework (moral philosophy, risk analysis, environmental ethics, or a survey of historical perspectives) and discuss what actions could reduce collective risk.
