B. Stepping out of a tactical role to assume a leadership role when needed. Developing subordinates for the future. Ensuring tasks are understood.
Why This Demonstrates Commitment
This option shows a leader prioritizing team success and growth over personal tasks, fulfilling core duties like volunteering for leadership, mentoring others, and clarifying expectations. Such actions build stronger teams and align with a duty mindset focused on mission success rather than procedures.
Comparison to Other Options
Option| Description| Why It Falls Short
---|---|---
A| Management by Objectives| Focuses on a process, not personal duty or team
development 2
C| Allowing subordinates to fail before stepping in| Risks harm and erodes
trust, indicating poor leadership 2
D| Providing unclear direction to test independence| Damages performance and
shows irresponsibility 2
Leaders like Paul O’Neill exemplified this by taking immediate action on safety issues, backing words with duty-driven decisions.
